so yours was pretty good besides the fact that i couldnt really figure out how to place down the blocks or play the game, until i did and then they took a while to place down so i died a million gajillion times, so maybe a little bit of work on control but other than that it was pretty good and pretty much a million times better than mine so yah.
Really well thought out. Mechanics are working really well, make sure to tie in the science content as you go, let people know why they should add woody debris to a stream, or why pollution is bad for macros. Or why macros are important.
i like the idea it needs work on what you can use like maybe you can use a store that says the price of things and has more options but i didn't learn much from this except that trash is bad and kills macros
I learned that trash is bad and it kills macros. i also learned that organic debris and nets are very beneficial. There wasnt an info screen, and if there was, i would advise adding in exactly what to do and how much everything costs, i would also put more change in difficulty in. overall i liked it, ther are just some small improvements. -Everett
It was fun until I lost all my towers and money and there was a ton of trash. It was a 7/10. It was pretty educational I learned that trash kills macros so 4/10. It was well developed but the trash looks like something else I have no idea. I would fix the way the towers shoot.
The game was a 2-3 on fun. I found this game incredibly boring because there was either no challenge or impossible. Also the strategy was really dry. The game needs more diversity. The educational scale is a 6 because the information was there but it was difficult to locate and hard to identify. The game was a 7 on development mainly because the nets work badly, otherwise the game was smooth. My one suggestion would be to make the nets move better and/or add more types of filters. -Dante
i give your game a 10/10 for fun it was fun and realistic. 8/10 for educations i lead how herd it is to keep a stream clean. 9/10 for development it was good i dint have any trouble from it. i suggest getting rid of 's' though i did win the game with it.
i don't know how to play the game, it does not have a point, so you need to explain how the game works.
ReplyDeletewell that is super helpful, oh and no one gets credit.
Deleteso yours was pretty good besides the fact that i couldnt really figure out how to place down the blocks or play the game, until i did and then they took a while to place down so i died a million gajillion times, so maybe a little bit of work on control but other than that it was pretty good and pretty much a million times better than mine so yah.
ReplyDeleteReally well thought out. Mechanics are working really well, make sure to tie in the science content as you go, let people know why they should add woody debris to a stream, or why pollution is bad for macros. Or why macros are important.
ReplyDeletegood game
ReplyDeletei like the idea it needs work on what you can use like maybe you can use a store that says the price of things and has more options but i didn't learn much from this except that trash is bad and kills macros
ReplyDeleteI learned that trash is bad and it kills macros. i also learned that organic debris and nets are very beneficial. There wasnt an info screen, and if there was, i would advise adding in exactly what to do and how much everything costs, i would also put more change in difficulty in. overall i liked it, ther are just some small improvements.
ReplyDelete-Everett
It was fun until I lost all my towers and money and there was a ton of trash. It was a 7/10.
ReplyDeleteIt was pretty educational I learned that trash kills macros so 4/10.
It was well developed but the trash looks like something else I have no idea. I would fix the way the towers shoot.
The game was a 2-3 on fun. I found this game incredibly boring because there was either no challenge or impossible. Also the strategy was really dry. The game needs more diversity. The educational scale is a 6 because the information was there but it was difficult to locate and hard to identify. The game was a 7 on development mainly because the nets work badly, otherwise the game was smooth. My one suggestion would be to make the nets move better and/or add more types of filters.
ReplyDelete-Dante
i give your game a 10/10 for fun it was fun and realistic.
ReplyDelete8/10 for educations i lead how herd it is to keep a stream clean.
9/10 for development it was good i dint have any trouble from it.
i suggest getting rid of 's' though i did win the game with it.